Standing Tiebout on his head : Tax capitalization and the monopoly power of local governments ∗
نویسنده
چکیده
Much of the public finance literature argues that local governments behave competitively due to residents’ ease of exit and entry. The model presented here challenges this widespread conclusion. Though it is costless to relocate to another locality, the presence of tax capitalization makes it impossible for land-owners to avoid monopolistic pricing of public services by moving; land-owners can only choose between paying the tax directly, or paying it indirectly in the form of a lower sale value for their housing if they exit. In consequence, the only real check on local governments comes through imperfectly functioning electoral channels.
منابع مشابه
Capitalization as a Two-Part Tariff: The Role of Zoning∗
In speculating that local public goods could be efficiently provided, Tiebout (1956) envisioned head taxes which would both finance public goods and price access to them. In practice, head taxes are not available, potentially leading to distortions. Hamilton (1975, 1976) responded that zoning can mimic a head tax by creating a price (or “admission ticket”) at the border. While the debate over t...
متن کاملThe Impact of Corporate income Tax and Firm Size on Fixed Investment
This paper is an attempt to analyze the impact of income taxes and market capitalization on fixed investment (investment in tangible assets) by manufacturing companies listed on KSE. This paper basically examines that how corporate income taxes affect fixed investment by reducing cash flow available for a firm to invest and how the firm size in the lights of market capitalization affects fixed ...
متن کاملOverlapping Jurisdictions 4.PDF
This paper discusses the common pool problems that arise when multiple territorially overlapping governments share access to a common tax base. Contrary to a competitive Tiebout model in which increasing the number of governments in an area increases competition and improves efficiency, when jurisdictions overlap, increasing the number of governments worsens externalities and a “tragedy of the ...
متن کاملEmpirical Test of the Relationship between Government's Power to Collect Taxes, Tax Revenues and Government Expenditures in Iran
According to the Kau and Rubin (K&R) hypothesis, increasing the government's power to collect taxes, through increased tax revenues, expand the public sector expenditure. In this regard, the main objective of this paper is to empirically test the relationship between government's power to collect taxes, tax revenues and government expenditures in Iran during the period of 1971-2013. For this pu...
متن کاملبررسی تحلیلی جایگاه خلافت عباسی در روند مشروعیت یابی حکومت های محلی ایران از هجوم مغول تا سقوط بغداد (656- 616 ق.)
Following the Mongol invasion of Iran in 616 AH. And the death of Sultan Muhammad Khwarazmshah in 617 AD. A period of political competition began to gain power and different parts of the country was under the influence of local governments The interval between the Mongol invasion and the fall of Baghdad and the formation of the Ilkhan dynasty was difficult for local governments in Iran in terms...
متن کامل